Jimmy Savile OBE

Jimmy Savile

Jimmy Savile (thanks to Wikipedia for image)

It seems that everybody knew about Jimmy Savile.  Well not everyone.  I didn’t.  I used to find him annoying and so did my best to ignore him.  When he died I barely registered the fact. And now it has come to light that he was in fact a monster, I am genuinely shocked.  I’m shocked by how long it has taken for it to come out and how easily the public was duped.  What are the lessons to be drawn?

Well for a start, lets understand what pedophilia is.  It has been around as long as we have records good enough to identify it.  It affects all classes and races and so must have a strong genetic component.  So like homosexuality, the people who suffer from it can’t help it.  Unlike homosexuality, it isn’t essentially harmless to the rest of us.  We need to do our best to understand and to take whatever steps need to be taken to minimise the risk to children.

One of the positive things that has happened over the last thirty years ago is that the subject is talked about a lot more widely.  This has to help in identifying specific cases.   What has not been nearly so positive, in fact what has been highly damaging is demonising pedophiles.  Their activities are repulsive so it is an easy trap to fall into, but it doesn’t remotely help.  But it is understandable that when presented with a specific story our sympathies for the victims spill into a visceral hatred of the perpetrator.

So what can we do about it?  Pedophiles aren’t going away, so we need to learn to live with them and if possible stop them offending.  This is a very difficult subject best left to professionals in general.  But I think there is one thing that would help a lot that is easy to understand and easy to implement.  I think we need to overhaul the libel laws.

Jimmy Savile was clearly an intelligent and ruthless man, who used very effective strategies to get away with his crimes.  One of these was the law of libel.  The newspapers didn’t dare finger him for fear of a lawsuit.  Now I am all for preventing press intrusion, but you can hardly say that the current law defends vulnerable individuals.

At the other end of the scale from Savile is Charlotte Church.  The Sun ran a countdown in its pages to her sixteenth birthday.  (I wonder if someone on the paper’s editorial team at the time might have had some pedophilic issues?  But I digress.)  As if that were bad enough she was later portrayed as a lush.  Again I have to admit to being niave.   I bought the whole story at the time, and assumed the Miss Church was an example of the decaying moral fibre of the working classes.  The truth is that Charlotte Church was simply a normal girl growing up and much the same as young people have always been.  The Sun was simply lying.

So the only justification for the lurid nature of the tabloid press in Britain, that it exposes the misdeeds of the powerful, is in fact the opposite of what actually happened.  The misdeeds were covered up, and imaginary misdeeds were printed.

Fortunately the Sun’s influence is declining and there are now a lot more sources of information and opinion.  Unfortunately I doubt the people behind it will ever end up behind bars where they belong.  I say radically reduce the power of the libel laws.  This might let a lot of nonsense into the public domain and cause some real suffering to some individuals.  But I don’t see how it can be worse than the current system that allows the weak to be abused with impunity and the powerful to get away with horrible crimes unchallenged.


Filed under Uncategorized

2 Responses to Jimmy Savile OBE

  1. hillary

    HI, love your work and have enjoyed hours of listening to Gibbons review – you’ve done a terrific job and I much appreciate it. I am a old fashioned ‘christian’ in so far as I avoid Christianity and I have been terribly blessed and have benefitted from your perspectives. The persepectives you’ve outlined have helped me debunk garbage when I encounter it. I recently found out what a sham the Chinese Inland Mission was, and also the Christian Womens Temperance Union. Yet these institutions have miserable distorted lives and well, it goes on. On the topic of Saville, knighted and all the rest – well he is one of many charismatic personality the whole world drools over. The world falls into thrall behind these stellar personalities… the parents of the children at risk – are enchanted by these top level entertainers/statesment/ higher ups: our “betters”.
    The desire for underage or infants, for sexual assault, is about power – it is a power thing to be sure. The weakness of trying to engage in infantile simplicity of sexual interaction with children, to ‘save’ or adopt a street boy – is the other end of the same power scale. But there is more. There’s a type of person, of whom Saville was one, who have the capacity for multitudes of sexual adventures – many times, daily and on going for weeks and months and years – a sexual rapaciousness far beyond the tolerance of the broadest section of the population. These strange types have no ‘stop’ button and I think, also lack any pity/compassion or awareness of ‘the other’. They can rape – and go again and keep going till said victim has expired. What is it with the human race we have these evil mechanisms most represented among the highest classes who wield the greatest power and influence and also marry among themselves, therefor multiplying the chances for such traits to be oft represented and carried on down the line? And it is not only infants, that just happens to be one aspect. I heard a clamouring to de-criminalise bestiality, logic being it does no harm to the animal. However it was a veteranarian who recently alerted authorities about said behavior of a animal rights worker… the poor dog having presented with obvious injury. So what is to be done? In the old days they used to run these types of people out of town, but nowadays, they are our knighted, our top flight communicators, our ‘betters’.

  2. Thanks Hillary. I hadn’t really thought about the power side of it all. The parallel between a Jimmy Savile and someone adopting a street child to show their power hadn’t occurred to me, but I see what you mean.

Leave a Reply